Mexican American Indian vs Samoan Female Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Samoan
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Samoans
12.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
24.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
13.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Samoan Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,566,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,122,232 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.236 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.71%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Samoan |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 35.6% | 28.6% |
Range | 33.3% | 27.1% |
Mean | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Median | 12.8% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Samoans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Honduran (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Ute (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.4%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Panama | 25.5 /100 | #196 | Fair 12.3% |
Hondurans | 25.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 12.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 24.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 12.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 24.7 /100 | #199 | Fair 12.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 22.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 12.3% |
Chinese | 22.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 12.3% |
Somalis | 21.5 /100 | #202 | Fair 12.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 21.1 /100 | #203 | Fair 12.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 20.9 /100 | #204 | Fair 12.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |