Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,517,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,636,404 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.811 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 4.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Immigrants from Eastern Europe |
Minimum | 0.46% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 19.4% | 88.9% |
Range | 18.9% | 86.4% |
Mean | 7.6% | 9.1% |
Median | 6.8% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |