Macedonian vs Ugandan Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Macedonian
Ugandan
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Macedonians
Ugandans
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Ugandan Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,583,440 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,977,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Macedonian | Ugandan |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 4.9% | 4.1% |
Range | 4.5% | 3.5% |
Mean | 2.2% | 2.2% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.97% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.78% | 0.82% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.78% | 0.81% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Ugandans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Icelander (2.4%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Chilean (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Indian (Asian) (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |