Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Norway Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Norway
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Norway
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Norway Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,829,236 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,699,496 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.793 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Norway |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 47.1% | 33.0% |
| Range | 46.7% | 30.7% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 8.2% |
| Median | 7.4% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Norway by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |