Kenyan vs Icelander Female Disability
COMPARE
Kenyan
Icelander
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Kenyans
Icelanders
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
80.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Icelander Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,210,759 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,732 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kenyan | Icelander |
| Minimum | 7.3% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 22.0% | 29.5% |
| Range | 14.6% | 27.3% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 12.8% |
| Median | 11.7% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Icelanders by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Syria (11.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Ugandan (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Norway (11.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Moldova (12.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (12.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Scotland (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kenya (12.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Nigerian (12.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.6 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Kenyans | 94.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 94.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Central Americans | 94.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ugandans | 94.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 93.8 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |