Israeli vs Brazilian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Israeli
Brazilian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Israelis
Brazilians
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Brazilian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,116,012 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,890,507 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.81%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Israeli | Brazilian |
Minimum | 0.023% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 14.3% | 13.4% |
Range | 14.3% | 11.1% |
Mean | 6.0% | 6.1% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Brazilians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |