Iranian vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Iranian
Zimbabwean
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Iranians
Zimbabweans
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,801,609 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 5.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 19.5% | 17.3% |
Range | 17.7% | 16.5% |
Mean | 5.4% | 5.5% |
Median | 4.7% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |