Inupiat vs Choctaw Female Disability
COMPARE
Inupiat
Choctaw
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Inupiat
Choctaw
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Choctaw Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,490 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,656,358 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 36.4%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 30.3% | 50.6% |
| Range | 26.9% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 23.8% |
| Median | 10.7% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 26.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Peru (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (15.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 2.3%), Colville (15.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |