Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Subsaharan African Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Subsaharan African
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Sub-Saharan Africans
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
MALE DISABILITY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Subsaharan African Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,811,453 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,010,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 8.8%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.5% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 41.0% | 38.5% |
Range | 39.5% | 34.8% |
Mean | 14.2% | 13.8% |
Median | 11.0% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Syria | 94.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (11.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Austrian (11.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Alsatian (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Panamanians | 3.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 3.8 /100 | #220 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 11.7% |
Alsatians | 3.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 3.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 11.7% |
Japanese | 3.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 11.7% |
Liberians | 3.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.8% |
Austrians | 2.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.8% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.8% |
Bermudans | 2.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.8% |
Croatians | 2.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.8% |
Dominicans | 1.8 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.8% |
Malaysians | 1.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.8% |
Mexicans | 1.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.8% |