Immigrants from Zaire vs Burmese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zaire
Burmese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zaire
Burmese
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zaire vs Burmese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,252,507 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.830 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,070,150 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zaire | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 12.6% | 18.9% |
| Range | 11.1% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 3.3% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.68% | 0.80% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zaire and Burmese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zaire are Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Moroccan (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Chile (2.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and Guatemalan (2.8%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |