Immigrants from Western Asia vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Swedish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Swedes
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,333,266 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,852,545 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.93%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Swedish |
Minimum | 3.3% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 12.5% | 47.7% |
Range | 9.3% | 46.9% |
Mean | 6.9% | 9.9% |
Median | 6.4% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia and Swedes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |