Immigrants from Western Asia vs Bahamian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Bahamian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Bahamians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Bahamian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,322,265 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,647,902 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.40%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Bahamian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 8.0% |
Range | 25.0% | 7.5% |
Mean | 3.7% | 2.8% |
Median | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia and Bahamians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |