Immigrants from Uganda vs Israeli Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Israeli
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Israelis
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Israeli Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,972,414 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,116,012 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.010%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Israeli |
Minimum | 0.18% | 0.023% |
Maximum | 15.5% | 14.3% |
Range | 15.3% | 14.3% |
Mean | 5.8% | 6.0% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Israelis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |