Immigrants from Turkey vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Chickasaw
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,019,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 47.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 14.5% | 29.7% |
Range | 13.0% | 28.2% |
Mean | 5.4% | 12.1% |
Median | 4.8% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (5.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |