Immigrants from Thailand vs Swiss Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Swiss
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Swiss
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
42.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Swiss Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,957,387 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,822,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.050%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Swiss |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 15.0% | 26.5% |
Range | 13.9% | 25.7% |
Mean | 7.0% | 7.5% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Swiss by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |