Immigrants from Sudan vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Creek
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,955,409 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 46.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Creek |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 12.8% | 30.8% |
Range | 10.7% | 28.5% |
Mean | 5.8% | 12.5% |
Median | 5.7% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |