Immigrants from South Africa vs Celtic Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Celtic
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Celtics
16.7%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
74.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Celtic Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,312,895 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,858,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 2.6%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Celtic |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 50.0% |
Range | 20.5% | 48.7% |
Mean | 12.7% | 16.4% |
Median | 12.6% | 15.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 6.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Native Hawaiian (16.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Moldova (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Belgian (16.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Serbian (16.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Philippines (16.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Egyptians | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Swiss | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Serbians | 99.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Belgians | 99.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 16.7% |
South Americans | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Danes | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |