Immigrants from Russia vs Brazilian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Brazilian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Brazilians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
77.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs Brazilian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,834,739 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,867,149 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.15%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | Brazilian |
Minimum | 0.87% | 0.82% |
Maximum | 18.5% | 7.3% |
Range | 17.7% | 6.5% |
Mean | 4.5% | 3.1% |
Median | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 3.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 0.65% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia and Brazilians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |