Immigrants from Portugal vs Mexican Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Portugal
Mexican
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Portugal
Mexicans
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
4.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
5.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Portugal vs Mexican Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,768,283 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,483,125 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.256 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 0.63%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Portugal | Mexican |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 11.1% | 4.7% |
| Range | 10.8% | 2.5% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.3% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 0.56% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 0.41% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 0.41% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Portugal and Mexicans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Portugal are Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |