Immigrants from Philippines vs Uruguayan Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Uruguayan
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Philippines
Uruguayans
11.3%
DISABILITY
94.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines vs Uruguayan Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,195,487 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,784,951 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.86%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 4.6% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 29.4% | 34.0% |
Range | 24.8% | 25.4% |
Mean | 11.8% | 14.6% |
Median | 11.3% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Uruguayans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Syria (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guyanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Bhutanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Greece (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 96.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 96.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 96.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Nicaraguans | 96.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 96.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 95.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 94.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Guyanese | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 94.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.3% |