Immigrants from Peru vs South African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
South African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
South Africans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Peru vs South African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,787,058 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,615 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 14.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Peru | South African |
Minimum | 0.24% | 0.31% |
Maximum | 13.2% | 27.3% |
Range | 13.0% | 27.0% |
Mean | 2.7% | 5.7% |
Median | 2.5% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 5.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Immigrants from Eritrea (2.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Spanish American Indian (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (3.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |