Immigrants from Norway vs Soviet Union Disability Age Over 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,660,458 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 45.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,492,822 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.684 and weighted average of 46.2%, a difference of 0.54%.

Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Norway	Soviet Union
Minimum	14.3%	17.4%
Maximum	71.9%	58.1%
Range	57.6%	40.7%
Mean	43.7%	42.4%
Median	42.7%	43.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	36.5%	37.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	52.0%	48.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	15.5%	10.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	14.9%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	14.6%	9.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Soviet Union by Disability Age Over 75

In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from North Macedonia (45.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Austrian (46.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Burmese (45.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from England (46.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Argentina (45.9%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Swiss (46.2%, a difference of 0.0%), New Zealander (46.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Europe (46.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (46.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Slavic (46.1%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age Over 75
Immigrants \| Argentina	99.6 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 45.9%
Burmese	99.5 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 45.9%
Immigrants \| Norway	99.5 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 45.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	99.5 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 45.9%
Austrians	99.5 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 46.0%
Immigrants \| England	99.5 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 46.0%
Immigrants \| Spain	99.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 46.0%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.4 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 46.0%
Immigrants \| Romania	99.3 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 46.0%
Jordanians	99.2 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 46.1%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.2 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 46.1%
Immigrants \| Hungary	99.1 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 46.1%
Cambodians	99.1 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 46.1%
Egyptians	99.0 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 46.1%
Serbians	99.0 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 46.1%
Slavs	98.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 46.1%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	98.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 46.2%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	98.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 46.2%
Swiss	98.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 46.2%
Soviet Union	98.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 46.2%
New Zealanders	98.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 46.2%