Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
69.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 477,037,225 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.468 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,316,169 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 8.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Europe | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 31.3% | 4.4% |
| Range | 30.1% | 2.7% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 3.0% |
| Median | 3.7% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 0.60% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 0.56% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 0.56% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe are Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |