Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Afghan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Afghan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Afghans
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Afghan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,057,261 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,842,568 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Afghan |
Minimum | 0.14% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 5.0% | 7.0% |
Range | 4.8% | 6.7% |
Mean | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Median | 1.9% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.1% | 2.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 0.76% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.84% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.83% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Afghans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Maltese (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Greece (2.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Armenian (2.0%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Latvian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Israeli (2.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |