Immigrants from Nicaragua vs British West Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nicaragua
British West Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nicaragua
British West Indians
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs British West Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,271,642 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,656,030 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nicaragua | British West Indian |
Minimum | 0.13% | 0.69% |
Maximum | 16.0% | 4.9% |
Range | 15.9% | 4.2% |
Mean | 2.9% | 2.5% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 0.88% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 0.80% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua and British West Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Immigrants from West Indies (2.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are White/Caucasian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 2.3% |
Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |