Immigrants from Israel vs Indian (Asian) Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Indian (Asian)
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Indians (Asian)
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Indian (Asian) Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,935,200 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,223,906 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 0.28% | 0.22% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 7.5% |
Range | 12.6% | 7.3% |
Mean | 2.9% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.83% | 0.76% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 0.77% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Indians (Asian) by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Poland (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%), European (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Estonian (2.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |