Immigrants from El Salvador vs Zimbabwean Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Zimbabwean
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Zimbabweans
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Zimbabwean Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,766,367 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.627 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,588 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.57%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 4.6% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 13.9% | 21.8% |
Range | 9.3% | 17.3% |
Mean | 9.6% | 11.1% |
Median | 10.0% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 11.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador and Zimbabweans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Spain (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), South American (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Peruvian (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Colombia (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South America (10.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Vietnamese | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.9% |
South Americans | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |