Immigrants from El Salvador vs Jordanian Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Jordanian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Jordanians
11.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Jordanian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,763,756 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.510 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,415,888 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Jordanian |
Minimum | 4.5% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 17.7% | 20.5% |
Range | 13.2% | 14.0% |
Mean | 10.4% | 10.6% |
Median | 10.6% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador and Jordanians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from South America (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Sri Lankan (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from France (11.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Inupiat (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | France | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Sri Lankans | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.4% |