Immigrants from Ecuador vs Zimbabwean Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Zimbabwean
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Zimbabweans
10.4%
MALE DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Zimbabwean Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,973,645 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.732 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,379 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 3.0% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 56.2% | 28.1% |
Range | 53.3% | 25.0% |
Mean | 10.9% | 11.3% |
Median | 9.9% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Zimbabweans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Immigrants from Belarus (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Laotian (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Sierra Leonean (10.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |