Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Arab Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Arab
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Arabs
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Arab Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,267,937 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,612,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.31%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Arab |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 14.6% | 17.8% |
Range | 13.0% | 15.3% |
Mean | 5.7% | 7.0% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Arabs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |