Immigrants from China vs Lebanese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Lebanese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Lebanese
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
91.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Lebanese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,042,790 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,594,018 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.42%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Lebanese |
Minimum | 2.8% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 68.2% |
Range | 29.4% | 63.4% |
Mean | 16.0% | 17.2% |
Median | 16.3% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Lebanese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (16.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Israeli (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Welsh (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Jordan (17.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Israelis | 91.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.9 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Welsh | 90.8 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 17.0% |