Immigrants from China vs Creek Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Creek
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Immigrants from China
Creek
8.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Creek Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,491,862 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,427,541 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.615 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 94.1%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Creek |
Minimum | 1.4% | 9.2% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 56.7% |
Range | 25.0% | 47.4% |
Mean | 7.2% | 24.6% |
Median | 6.6% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 29.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 9.3% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Bolivia (8.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Iranian (8.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (8.8%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Israel (8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and Thai (8.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.86%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |