Immigrants from Central America vs Creek Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Creek
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Creek
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs Creek Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,995,824 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,433,224 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 48.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | Creek |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 14.7% | 13.4% |
| Range | 14.4% | 11.8% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 6.1% |
| Median | 2.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (3.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (3.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 0.71%), Aleut (4.3%, a difference of 2.0%), Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 2.5%), Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |