Immigrants from Cameroon vs Latvian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cameroon
Latvian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cameroon
Latvians
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Latvian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,739,199 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cameroon and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,706,558 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.70%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cameroon | Latvian |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.23% |
Maximum | 13.7% | 28.4% |
Range | 10.8% | 28.1% |
Mean | 5.9% | 7.3% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 9.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cameroon and Latvians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cameroon are Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |