Immigrants from Belgium vs Bhutanese Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belgium
Bhutanese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belgium
Bhutanese
11.0%
DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belgium vs Bhutanese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,717,814 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,521,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 1.6%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belgium | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 3.1% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 43.8% | 21.0% |
Range | 40.7% | 17.0% |
Mean | 14.9% | 11.5% |
Median | 11.7% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium and Bhutanese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Cameroon (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Poland (11.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Chilean (11.1%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Eastern European (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Ecuadorian (11.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (11.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Chileans | 99.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 98.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Palestinians | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |