Immigrants from Australia vs Inupiat Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Inupiat
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Inupiat
11.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Inupiat Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,197,779 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.652 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,490 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Inupiat |
Minimum | 1.4% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 48.6% | 30.3% |
Range | 47.1% | 26.9% |
Mean | 14.3% | 11.8% |
Median | 11.7% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Inupiat by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Egypt (11.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Japan (11.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Cypriot (11.2%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |