Immigrants from Australia vs Celtic Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Celtic
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Celtics
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Celtic Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,976 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,862,473 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 23.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 50.0% |
Range | 14.9% | 48.7% |
Mean | 6.8% | 9.7% |
Median | 5.8% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 11.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Jamaican (6.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Sioux (6.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from West Indies (6.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and White/Caucasian (6.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |