Immigrants from Africa vs Yugoslavian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Yugoslavian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Yugoslavians
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
46.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Yugoslavian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,780,270 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,572,549 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 0.17% | 0.30% |
Maximum | 4.2% | 8.8% |
Range | 4.0% | 8.5% |
Mean | 2.1% | 2.5% |
Median | 2.1% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.50% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.70% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.70% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Yugoslavians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Icelander (2.1%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |