Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Cherokee Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Cherokee
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Cherokee
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Cherokee Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,644,439 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,548,902 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 29.0%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Cherokee |
Minimum | 5.7% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 27.6% | 57.1% |
Range | 21.9% | 54.6% |
Mean | 12.1% | 20.9% |
Median | 11.6% | 20.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 23.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Eritrea (11.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lebanon (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Sierra Leonean (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Jordan (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Chileans | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cajun (14.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Pima (14.8%, a difference of 0.48%), Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |