Icelander vs Immigrants from Africa Female Disability
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants from Africa
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants from Africa
12.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
80.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
90.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants from Africa Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,732 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,320,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 0.74%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants from Africa |
Minimum | 2.2% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 29.5% | 37.1% |
Range | 27.3% | 33.7% |
Mean | 12.8% | 12.8% |
Median | 12.0% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants from Africa by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Moldova (12.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (12.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Scotland (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Sudanese (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Kenya (12.0%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from Sudan (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Romanian (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Estonian (12.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Ugandans | 94.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 93.8 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |