Guatemalan vs U.S. Virgin Islander Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Guatemalan
U.S. Virgin Islander
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Guatemalans
U.S. Virgin Islanders
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs U.S. Virgin Islander Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,374,057 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,522,963 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.24%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | U.S. Virgin Islander |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 0.26% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 17.9% |
| Range | 6.1% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.7% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.81% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and U.S. Virgin Islanders by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Turkish (2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Chile (2.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Yemen (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Immigrants from Yemen (2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Cypriot (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Turkish (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |