Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Guatemalans
Immigrants from Bangladesh
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
30.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
24.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,382,771 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,637,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.36%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.46% |
Maximum | 13.2% | 15.9% |
Range | 11.9% | 15.4% |
Mean | 6.4% | 6.1% |
Median | 6.2% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 7.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Immigrants from Bangladesh by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |