French Canadian vs Houma Disability Age Under 5
COMPARE
French Canadian
Houma
Disability Age Under 5
Disability Age Under 5 Comparison
French Canadians
Houma
1.9%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian vs Houma Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,253,201 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,359,385 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.231 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 0.62%.
Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French Canadian | Houma |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.72% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 5.4% |
| Range | 48.7% | 4.6% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 2.6% |
| Median | 3.3% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to French Canadians and Houma by Disability Age Under 5
In terms of disability age under 5, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Chippewa (1.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Choctaw (1.9%, a difference of 0.30%), American (1.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Osage (1.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and Dutch West Indian (1.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Choctaw (1.9%, a difference of 0.32%), American (1.9%, a difference of 0.47%), Chippewa (1.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Osage (1.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Sioux (1.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Under 5 |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 1.7% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 1.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 1.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 1.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 1.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 1.8% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 1.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 1.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 1.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 1.9% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 1.9% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 1.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 1.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 1.9% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 1.9% |
| Paraguayans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 2.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 2.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 2.3% |