European vs Sioux Hearing Disability
COMPARE
European
Sioux
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Europeans
Sioux
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Sioux Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,261,732 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,128,884 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.296 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 3.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | European | Sioux |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.37% |
Maximum | 27.1% | 17.9% |
Range | 26.0% | 17.5% |
Mean | 7.2% | 4.5% |
Median | 4.8% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Europeans and Sioux by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Ute (3.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and Spaniard (3.5%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Delaware (3.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Spanish (3.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Blackfeet (3.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and Swedish (3.6%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |