Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from Hong Kong
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,167,947 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,955,040 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 0.47%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 0.17% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 9.8% | 8.4% |
Range | 9.6% | 7.4% |
Mean | 4.9% | 5.0% |
Median | 4.9% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |