Egyptian vs Nicaraguan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Egyptian
Nicaraguan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Egyptians
Nicaraguans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Nicaraguan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,851,479 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,654,753 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 0.17%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian | Nicaraguan |
| Minimum | 0.86% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 5.4% | 8.8% |
| Range | 4.5% | 7.6% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 2.8% |
| Median | 2.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 0.81% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.89% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.88% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Egyptians and Nicaraguans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Africa (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belize (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nepal (2.7%, a difference of 0.35%), Peruvian (2.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.7%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Africa (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Central American (2.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Afghan (2.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Belize (2.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Central Americans | 97.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Afghans | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Argentineans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 97.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Asians | 97.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 97.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Mongolians | 97.4 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.7% |