Ecuadorian vs American Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
American
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
Americans
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
72.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs American Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,812,387 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 581,739,029 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 0.41%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | American |
Minimum | 6.5% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 22.2% | 39.1% |
Range | 15.7% | 33.6% |
Mean | 16.2% | 18.8% |
Median | 16.5% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Americans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Tlingit-Haida (17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Turkey (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Syria (17.2%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173 | Average 17.3% |
Laotians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 17.3% |
Tsimshian | 49.8 /100 | #175 | Average 17.3% |