Creek vs Romanian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Creek
Romanian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Creek
Romanians
16.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Romanian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,427,541 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.615 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,665,607 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 59.3%.
![Creek vs Romanian Disability Age 35 to 64](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/disability-age-35-to-64/creek-vs-romanians-disability-age-35-to-64-chart.webp)
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Romanian |
Minimum | 9.2% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 56.7% | 34.3% |
Range | 47.4% | 33.6% |
Mean | 24.6% | 12.6% |
Median | 22.7% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.4% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.5% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 6.1% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Creek by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.86%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Norway (10.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Maltese (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (10.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Moldova (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 95.5 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Vietnamese | 95.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Maltese | 94.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Estonians | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 94.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 94.1 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 10.6% |
South Africans | 93.3 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 10.7% |