British vs Immigrants from Cuba Female Disability
COMPARE
British
Immigrants from Cuba
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
British
Immigrants from Cuba
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
20.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Immigrants from Cuba Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,338,456 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,981,608 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.52%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Immigrants from Cuba |
Minimum | 6.2% | 7.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 19.6% |
Range | 93.8% | 12.3% |
Mean | 25.6% | 12.0% |
Median | 16.2% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.1% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.9% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to British and Immigrants from Cuba by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Bahamas (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Samoan (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Croatian (12.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Somali (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Chinese | 22.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 12.3% |
Somalis | 21.5 /100 | #202 | Fair 12.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 21.1 /100 | #203 | Fair 12.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 20.9 /100 | #204 | Fair 12.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |
Europeans | 12.1 /100 | #219 | Poor 12.4% |
Bahamians | 11.1 /100 | #220 | Poor 12.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 10.8 /100 | #221 | Poor 12.4% |