British vs Chinese Male Disability
COMPARE
British
Chinese
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
British
Chinese
12.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Chinese Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,329,993 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,721 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.010%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 31.9% |
| Range | 97.5% | 30.7% |
| Mean | 22.7% | 13.4% |
| Median | 17.1% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.5% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.7% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.6% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to British and Chinese by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.19%), German Russian (12.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Swiss (12.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and European (12.1%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Swiss (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), European (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and German Russian (12.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.0 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 1.0 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Danes | 0.9 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hungarians | 0.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Poles | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.0% |
| German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 0.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.5 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.0% |
| British | 0.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Chinese | 0.4 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Europeans | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Basques | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Belgians | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Swedes | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Slavs | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Canadians | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.2% |